CBS, of the utmost importance to pay a settlement of $ 16 million to Trump
‘Fox & Friends’ co-host Charlie Hurt rejects after CBS News and Paramount have agreed to an arrangement on the adaptation of the ’60 minutes’ interview with Kamala Harris that the Trump team claims that the 2024 elections have influenced the elections.
For the first time, after decades of trying, Republicans appear about PBS and NPR about the wild left -wing bias of their news report, and remarkable, instead of promising changes, the progressive elites responsible for Trump derangement double.
It all happens, even if the congress is considering a dissolution of President Donald Trump to lower their Lefty Slush Fund.
White House is urged to reduce federal financing for NPR, PBS at the congress
On Wednesday, the PBS Newshour broadcast a segment about the victory of Trump in a lawsuit against CBS News, who was satisfied with $ 16 million about misleading adaptation with “60 minutes” of a Kamala Harris interview during the 2024 campaign.
To tackle the problem, they brought CNN’s Brian Stelter, the same Brian Stelter who last year with a straight face the ridiculous line of the White House in Parroted that President Biden was in order and only a victim of the right -wing video “Cheap Fakes”.
Paramount Global and CBS agreed on Tuesday to arrange President Trump’s $ 20 billion election interference against the network. (Getty Images)
You remember, about eight minutes before Grandpa Joe imploded at a debate stage.
It will not surprise you to hear that the left -wing, water -bearing Stelter told the left -wing water -bearing newshour that the left -wing water -bearing “CBS has actually done nothing wrong here. CBS who deals with standard television news processing practices.”
At this point, in a failure of journalistic ethics that Pravda -Blush would make, Amna Nawaz would supposedly make the straight news anchor that Amna Nawaz gave the amazing lie of Stelter, no pushback. In fact, the Abjectly subjective and clearly biased opinion on Stelter was easily treated as a fact.
So what really happened? We have seen it all. One morning during the election campaign, “60 minutes” published a clip of his Harris interview in which she answered a question about Israel with a run-on onzinszin that made Joe Biden look eloquent.
But, see, when the episode was broadcast, the answer we had already seen was no longer replaced by a highly processed version that made Harris almost convincing.

Bill Whitaker’s “60 minutes” interview with former vice-president Kamala Harris is central to a lawsuit with high deployment. (Screenshots/CBS News)
In the original clip, when host Bill Whitaker asks why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not listening to Biden, Harris said the following:
“Well, Bill … the work we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were highly inspired by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what should be done in the region.”
And here is the answer that was ultimately broadcast on the program:
“We are not going to stop pursuing what is needed for the United States to be clear about where we stand for the need for this war to end.”
In no universe of honest and honest journalism can this blatant clean-up Stelpad Harris be seen as something other than CBS news that tries to make the democratic candidate look better. It is not a standard practice, it is a lie.
PBS Newshour and Stelter did not dare to roll the actual ties, or their weak claim that CBS news -mother company Paramount Trump bribes to get approval for a merger would have collapsed faster than CNN’s assessments.

And this is not a new problem for public broadcasts. It was April from last year when the old NPR editor Uri Berliner wrote a destructive column about the shameful, spoken as mildly, bias at the outlet.
But have we seen changes? Have we seen that the managers who run PBS and NPR take action to present an honest news product? Clearly not. As the Stelter interview shows, these points of sale are still as bad as ever.
It seems very much that, after they have resigned themselves to the fact that Republicans are going to reduce their direct federal financing, PBS and NPR have decided to go into everything on the Anti-Trump-sentiment crazy. Maybe they can move a few extra carrier bags and umbrellas.
Given the completely lack of regret of PBS and NPR, even when the proof of their rank prejudice arises as waste during a garbage bin, no self -respecting Republican should vote to give them a dime.
Click here for more the opinion of Fox News
PBS and NPR have been given for years, even decades, to tidy up their action and to tackle their responsibility to offer unbiased news in the service of the public, not employed by the Democratic Party.
The time is to. Public broadcast can be a propaganda arm from the left or can be financed by taxpayers; It can no longer be both.
Click here to get the Fox News app
And with the passage of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, millions of people who love public broadcasts will be free to donate their important tax savings to PBS and NPR, while the rest of us can unsubscribe from fake news.
I call that a win-win.
Click here to Van David Marcus