A few hours before he was killed, the last series of Facebook reports by Charlie Kirk included a criticism of one Wall Street Journal -article Regarding the growing national effects of Kentucky’s Historical Guardianship Act of children, who has a refutable suspicion that assumes that equal parenting time is in the interest of a child.
The WSJ article noted the falling divorce rate in the Bluegrass State because of the historical law and how four more states have adopted comparable laws. However, there is another compelling reason for both parties to insist on shared parenthood: voters want this, and evidence shows that it has an influence on how they vote.
And the more vocal political candidates are about supporting the custody of equal parenting time, the more votes they get.
NY Times Columnist defends conviction that Charlie Kirk practiced politics ‘in the right way’ after liberal recoil
After Kentucky’s shared parenting law branded into life, the autumn election to be followed soon showed a Direct correlation Between winning the percentage of races and the support of the legislators for the bill. 100% of the sponsors won 90% of those who voted ‘yes’, 80% of those who did not vote won and none of those who ‘no’ voted. In fact, every bill that ran again won, despite 14 seats that change parties.
A new parent manual has been launched to help parents of K-12 students in navigating “Woke” concepts in their children’s schools. (Istock via Getty Images)
The Republicans and Democrats should not be surprised by this, because the voters constantly tell them that they support shared parenthood. It is also not only in Kentucky. The National Parents Organization has Commissioned by independent poll In 29 states, and shared parenting has enormous support in every state, both red and blue. Not only do the vast majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support the legislation, but also the majorities of every demography. It doesn’t matter whether women, men, afro -americans or Hispanics are being interviewed. They all show majority support for shared parenting.
Kirk’s function to support equal custody laws subtly led the parties to promote shared parenthood, because it makes voters rather vote for which party offers a pro-Shared parenting candidate. Both parties that get a few extra voters in a swing state such as North Carolina could influence an election.
Furthermore, the voters from Tar All State tell the parties loudly and clear how they can get more votes: pass shared parenting. An amazing 94% said that they “have more likely to vote for a candidate who supports children who are equal or almost equal to every parent … when both parents are fit and willing to become parents.”
Voters in crucial Pennsylvania tell the parties the same with a clip of 91%. In Wisconsin, the State State in the 2016 presidential election, it is even higher, by 96%. In every swing surveyed, candidates can get a similar boost with the 94% of Georgia and the 95% supported support of New Hampshire.
Main Scotus Parent Rights Affairs Draw McMahon, Mothers for Liberty to Rally on Court Steps
It is surprising that none of the parties has put a big push on the subject. First, shared parenthood seems to be an obvious democratic issue. The national brand Democrat praises equality problems, and what is more the same than the same guardianship time for both parents? The Democrats can promote shared parenthood and it will resonate with their basis, which requires legal fairness for all groups. Afro -Marikans and LGBTQ individuals have a lot of distrust of the legal system, and many do not believe that they can get a fair hearing if the other parent is white and/or justice. Furthermore, the liberal party has spent money studying how you can enter with men. Well, only 13% of the Kentuckians said that the family courts would probably not give men less custody of children.
Speaking of men, should they not be on the side of the Republican of the gender gorge? So why is this not an obvious GOP issue? Their basic power is for men, a group that not only supports shared parenthood, but believes that they do not receive fair treatment in court. Furthermore, the Republicans want to take place with groups of minorities. Minority people and women support the same education, and that of course includes the crucial Spanish swing voice.
In a well-divided nation, the voters tell the parties the same as Charlie Kirk: support pro-equality of family law. The Democrats or the Republicans can get a lead in Swing -States and voting blocks by taking a problem that both bases want. Or maybe I should say their current bases, because this powerful issue of both parties gives a chance to eat in the base of the other.
