A 20-point peace plan presented by President Donald Trump this week could finally close the almost two-year war in the Gaza Strip and still see the return of the 46 hostages through Hamas. But it can also put an end to the time of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the top track of the Israeli government.
Hamas still has to agree to the plan that Netanyahu accepted on Monday, which would ultimately end the military operation of Israel, disapprove of Hamas and releases the road for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip under a Palestinian administrative body under the supervision of an international coalition led by Trump.
Trump said that this could be the ‘award -winning performance’ of the Israeli Prime Minister, but the acceptance by Netanyahu of the plan could ultimately determine whether his government collapses or finds renewed support.
Trump reveals 20-point plan to secure peace in Gaza, including the granting of a number of Hamas members ‘Amnesty’
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talks to US President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on April 7, 2025 in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty images)
In June, the right -wing coalition of Netanyahu survived an urge to early elections, which could have led to the dissolution of his government and had advanced an election for October 2026.
But in July his government lost the majority in the Israeli parliament after two of its parties had withdrawn from his coalition and had control over only 50 of the 120 seats, which could pose a significant threat if a push for early elections was tried again.
The party of Netanyahu is becoming increasingly anticipated, whereby his party of hard judges of his party threatens to bring down his government about any concessions made in the war against Hamas.
“This new Trump plan is in conflict with all their final pin targets-even, at least on paper, promises to satisfy much of the core war of Israel in terms of the return of all hostages, the disarming of Hamas and the termination of rule and the thorough demilitaries,” he added.
Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir-Die at the beginning of 2025 resigned about his opposition against the Stakes-Het-Furen and hostages who saw the release of 33 hostages before he was recovered in March made his wish clear to see the annexation of Gaza with Israeli settlements that move and the full elimin.
Trump’s proposal, although it is not specifically a path for the Palestinian state, is blocking Israeli annexation plans and would give Hamas “Amnestie” and a path from Gaza if they disarm.
On Tuesday, Finance Minister Smotrich convicted Trump’s plan as a “clear diplomatic failure” and said that it came down to “a closing of the eyes and turning all the lessons of October 7”.
Netanyahu apologized for air strikes during ‘heart-to-heart’ with Qatari leader, says Trump
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets IDF commanders in the Netzarim -Gang in Gaza to discuss Hamas activity on November 19, 2024. (Photo supplied by TPS)
“In my estimate it will end in tears,” he said in a position in X. “A tragedy of leadership that fled out of the truth.”
Although Netanyahu is confronted with enormous pressure within his own party among those who believe that he has admitted the security requirements, he is also confronted with a huge opposition among the audience.
His inability to close a hostage and his constant aggressive military operations in Gaza have encouraged many Israelis to wonder whether Netanyahu has given priority to military operations, and perhaps his political ambitions, on the return of the hostages held for 725 days.
Hannah pointed out that it would have been “disastrous” for Netanyahu not to accept Trump’s plan, given the growing isolationism of Israel on the world stage, but also in the midst of Rocky Politics at home.
“It is absolutely necessary for the long -term safety of Israel and, to be honest, for the political future of Netanyahu to keep the US and Trump on the side,” he said, noticed that Trump is enjoying more popularity among Israelis than Netanyahu.
The approval classifications have repeatedly demonstrated that Netanyahu will probably not survive election if this would happen in the immediate term.
It is unclear how the public opinion of Netanyahu can be reformed by his acceptance of Trump’s plan, especially if Hamas also agrees and the hostages can be returned within 72 hours, as determined under the proposal after a joint agreement.
The most important opposition of Netanyahu and former Prime Minister, Yair Lapid, said that the number one threat for the success of the plan is a “yes, but” approach.
Protesters hold photos of hostages while marching during a rally in which the Israeli government is called to sign a deal to release hostages in the Gaza Strip on August 26, 2025, in Tel Aviv, Israel. (Amir Levy/Getty images)
Click here to get the Fox News app
“What the plan now threatens are not the people who say ‘no’, such as Ben-Gvir or the Iranians, but the people who say ‘yes, but’ he said on X. ” Netanyahu is an experienced and tiring expert in ‘yes, but’ he usually says that the ‘yes’ in Washington, who’ but when he is home ‘and the’ but ‘but’ but when he was home ‘, and when he was home’ and ‘but’ but when he was home ‘, and when he was home’ ‘,’ The ‘basic’ reminds him who is the boss. “
Other opposition leaders supported the Netanyahu agreement with the plan, including leader of the Blue and White Party, Benny Gantz, who said his party “would not allow small politics to sabotage the plan.”
Although it is unclear how Israel will respond to Netanyahu If a deal is reached, Goldberg argued that the deal is ultimately a victory for Israel.
“The devil is always in the details and we have a shortage of details, but from a principle perspective this would be a clear Israeli victory,” said Goldberg. “When you add the requirements for demilitaries and deradicalization in Gaza and a fundamental overhaul of the Palestinian authority, in addition to a path to the standardization of Saudi-Israel, all topline principles and goals correspond to the safety interests of Israel and war objectives.”
