In the aftermath of the tragedy Minnesota shootingwe are suffering yet another high-profile moment of blatant bias in the liberal media – a slant so pervasive that the perpetrators seem unaware of the bias, but also outraged when someone points it out. And this time, the missteps come when America is already divided, fearful and ready to view every story through a partisan prism. You’d think, given the national mood, that major news organizations might show some restraint before adding fuel to the cultural fire. Instead, too many people are filling up their buses.
The tragedy in Minneapolis – the fatal shooting of a woman by an ICE officer during a chaotic, escalating confrontation – has already polarized red and blue America faster than social media can renew.
Facts are still emerging. Multiple videos from different angles are still being analyzed. Researchers are still conducting interviews. Yet the progressive press has made it clear that it is not worth waiting. It marches forward with a predetermined narrative designed more for political warfare than public understanding.
Many major newsrooms, which claim to publish careful, definitive deconstructions of the publicly available video, exclude or even fail to acknowledge videos that favor the shooter. Marketing outlets that insist they provide “context,” “fact-checking,” and “accountability journalism” have deliberately swept away anything that complicates their favorite storyline. The audience is presented with a composite film – not to inform, but to convince.
And the backlash has already begun.
RENEE GOOD’S WIFE CLAIMED THE MINNEAPOLIS SHOOTING WAS ‘MY FAULT’ IN VIDEO AMID ANTI-ICE RAGE
During the White House press conference on Thursday Vice President J.D. Vance delivered a speech a stern and justified rebuke of the press corps. His criticism was not ideological, but factual.
Referring to CNN’s wording of the story, Vance said: “CNN’s headline on what happened in Minneapolis… I’m just going to read it: ‘Outrage after ICE officer kills US citizen in Minneapolis.’ Well, that’s one way of putting it. And that’s the way a lot of people come in the corporate media carried out this attack in the last 24 hours.”
NOEM CLAIMS WOMAN KILLED IN ICE SHOOTING, ‘STALKING AND OBSTRUCTION’ OFFICERS ALL DAY
He then went further, calling out the broader press for their selective omissions: “The way the media has generally reported this story is an absolute disgrace, and it puts our law enforcement officers at risk every day.”
You’d think, given the national mood, that major news organizations might show some restraint before adding fuel to the cultural fire. Instead, too many people are filling up their buses.
This kind of media bias is a problem for all Americans, red, blue and purple, and it damages the spirit of the country and increases the dangers in what should be an open town square. Consider some of the glaring examples already on display:
MINNEAPOLIS MAYOR DEMANDS STATE TO BE INCLUDED IN ICE-INVOLVED SHOOTING PROBE, SLAMS PAM BONDI’S DOJ
• Selective editing and selection of footage. Many media outlets have aired a slowed-down, zoomed-in sequence of the moment the officer deploys his weapon – but conveniently left it out. earlier images suggest the woman used her vehicle to block traffic and video later emerged showing the car making contact with the ICE officer. The audience was presented with a conclusion without the context needed to reach that conclusion.
• Loaded characterizations masquerading as direct reporting. Articles describe the officer not as “the officer” or even “the shooter,” but as “the ICE agent whose bullet ended the life of an unarmed woman.” That is not neutral language. Meanwhile, key details about Renee Good, the woman who was killed, have been ignored, including whether she disobeyed law enforcement’s request to get out of her car. When Hillary Clinton deems Good’s death an “assassination,” the liberal press doesn’t back down. Compare that to the charges from Trump administration officials who put forward the opposite conclusion.
• Excellent expert commentary. Several newsrooms were present experts in the field of use of force but only those who strongly condemned the officer’s actions. Experts who said the video was inconclusive, or who warned that officers often perceive vehicle threats differently than civilians, are not cited.
HOUSE REPUBLICANS DEFEND ICE AGENTS IN DEADLY SHOOTING, SAY USE OF FORCE WAS JUSTIFIED
• Social media amplification that trumps the facts. Initial headlines labeled the incident an “execution-style murder,” but were softened hours later additional video surfaced. But by then the story had already solidified.
These decisions are not trivial mistakes. They directly cut into credibility – the only real currency that journalism still has.
America needs patience, clarity and humility from the media at a volatile moment like this. But instead we get the familiar cycle: rush to judgment, moral certainty, and absolute refusal to acknowledge complexity or admit to initial inaccuracies. Many in the press seem to believe that by admitting uncertainty or ambiguity, or even waiting for factual clarity, they are “taking the other side.” Balanced reporting is not seen as a professional obligation, but as a political betrayal.
JEFFRIES CALLS NAME ‘STONE COLD LIAR’ OVER MINNEAPOLIS SHOOTING RESPONSE, DEMANDS INVESTIGATIONS
That’s not journalism. It’s messaging.
None of this is to say that the cop is automatically justified or that the woman’s death isn’t a terrible tragedy. Even if the shooting is ultimately deemed legal or consistent with training, a young woman is gone and a community mourns. But tragedies require sobriety, not political opportunism. They demand a commitment to the facts, not a sprint to partisan talking points.
Incidents of this nature are often complicated on all sides, and tragic and life-changing for all involved. Simplifying the story and ignoring contradictory elements does not make them disappear; it just makes the audience learn through it influencers and non-traditional mediaand not traditional journalists.
Vice President Vance’s point is simple: You can’t rebuild trust while feeding the public a composite version of events.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS ADVICE
If our country wants less division — on this story and in general — the national press must stop exacerbating already smoldering civil tensions. Start with the basics: don’t prematurely call something “murder” without hard evidence. Don’t erase the facts that complicate your story. Don’t bury videos that you know the other half of the country has already seen circulating online.
Accuracy is not biased. Honesty is not surrender.
The incident in Minnesota is real life. A woman is dead. A community is torn apart. Laws and how to enforce them remain part of the fabric of this country.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Lack of strong, solid and honest reporting in the dominant media will only lead to more chaos, misery and tragedy for American citizens.
If the press wants to regain the trust it continues to squander, now would be a good time to start.
CLICK HERE TO BY MARK HALPERIN
