Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is a former Democratic Congressman from Hawaii who now serves in the Trump government. She ran for President as Democrat in 2020. If the parties and election results were reversed and a Republican congressman had joined the Kamala Harris government, the liberal media elites would have found its courageous and fascinating, such as a Liz Cheney-style figure.
So when Gabbard released new documents that the Obama administration demonstrated, she produced incoming President Donald Trump as the unlawful beneficiary of Russian collusion in the 2016 elections, the media dealt with it as a toxic waste. Every press event designed to please Trump was automatically rejected as the Craven Act of a loyalist who kissed the big boss.
The nocturnal news broadcasts from ABC and NBC have skipped it. CBS gave it 41 seconds. The next day, CBS and NBC reported suspiciously about Gabbard in the morning shows. NBC’s Garrett Haake denounced “Tulsi Gabbard who tried to rewrite the history of the election interference of Russia 2016 and to accuse the former President Obama without proof of manipulating intelligence.” She brought proof and they still scream ‘without proof’.
CNN -Gastheren reject new RussiaGate certificate as ‘distraction’ of Epstein files: should ‘not even repeat’
When Team Trump releases old documents, it is part -time. It is armed. It is a desperate distraction. When the democratic elites and the media conspiracy to release harmful allegations about Trump, it is presented to the public as non -party, as a democracy in action and anything but a distraction. It is the main event. It is bait for the Emmy’s, the Peabody Awards and the Pulitzer prices.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sparked the Russiagate compamy during a press conference of the White House on July 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty images)
The media control claims for democratic politicians. Their goal is damage for Republicans. Harmful Republicans is what “trusted, fact -based, independent journalists” do.
Krab a journalist and they will tell you that it is so politically awkward (and Trumpy) that documents on television are released in the briefing room of the White House by a Trump officer. When the Democrats together to ruin Trump, they leaked quietly at those “independent” journalists, who then did not want to mention that they received dirt from PR companies such as Fusion GPS, who were paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign to spread false information, such as the junk in the “Steele Dossier.” The networks got briefly to the Hillary connection when it came out, and quickly continued, as if that was an insignificant issue. It is not necessary to be obsessed with the annoying sausage they made.
New Russiagate certificate ‘points directly to’ Obama, doj will decide ‘criminal implications’: gabbard
Left-wing journalists use anonymous sources to hide the very particial nature of the leakers, and there was a lot of surfing on anonymous sources in the tidal wave of Anti-Trump journalism. The broadcast networks have easily collected mucus from “mainstream” sources such as the New York Times or the Atlantic Ocean.
This broadcast “Institutions” are not about to unravel a story of Russian collusion that they promote relentlessly during the first term of Trump. We counted 2,284 minutes of Russiago reporting on the ABC, CBS and NBC news broadcasts only from 2017 to 2019. Even if the then FBI director Robert Mueller Trump never sued collusion, it was a very stubborn black cloud trying to achieve Team Trump.
In the first months of 2017 it was the dominant Trump story. When Trump kept a press conference in February and denounced the press, NBC’s Chuck Todd tweeted: “This is not a smiling issue. I am sorry, delegitimizing the press is On-American.” He added: “Press Bashen can feel good for people, but if it is done by people in power, it is corrosive. Take off your partisan hats.”
Legacy Media Winkers are largely silent about Tulsi Gabbard’s Bombshell Obama administration claims
The networks do not take off their partisan hats. They pretend that only their critics look like partisans.
Click here for more the opinion of Fox News
The networks did not want to concentrate on Trump’s performance in his first term, and not just because successes in making conservative public policy are not “performance” in their eyes. They wanted Trump to be best known to sell America to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and to explain the scenario that the end of his presidency could take place at any time.
Their Wishful Thinking is often defined as ‘news’. It doesn’t sound like the ‘nocturnal news’. It sounds like a nocturnal story, carefully built up for political effect. It was an important part of Trump’s evening reporting of the evening that was about 90% negative every month.
The broadcast networks have easily collected mucus from “mainstream” sources such as the New York Times or the Atlantic Ocean.
There are a number of “precious stones” of the anti-Trump collusion campaign of the media. On ABC’s “The View” in 2017, co-gastheer Sunny Hostin mourned the defeat of Hillary Clinton: “What cost her the election, in my modest opinion the hacking of Russia” and racism-she called what CNN’s of Jones called a “Whitelash”.
Click here to get the Fox News app
On ABC’s “This Week” in 2018, the New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg stated: “We don’t know if Putin is his handler, his hero or his co-samener, but it is clear where his loyalty is rather than lying with the American people.”
Now, when Trump accuses Obama of betrayal in the Russian issue, “the vision” co-gastheer Joy Behar demanded to know: “Why can’t Obama Trump sue because of defamation?” But Hear and Hostin have repeatedly accused Trump of betrayal over the past five years. There it is again: if we call you treacherous, it is not defamatory.
Click here to Van Tim Graham
