Over the past few decades, the gender conversation in the West has blamed one consistent villain: men. When times were good, masculinity was rejected as an unearned privilege. When times grew darker, it was renamed poisonous. Under every hashtag and viral moment, the same warning sounded: men are collectively and individually a barrier to women’s safety, prosperity, and fulfillment.
What certainly started as a sincere effort to encourage true equality between the sexes and the right thing to do in places where injustice and cruelty occurred ended up veering way off course, as these things often happen. Suddenly, masculinity – a biological reality over which a man has no more say than he does over breathing – was classified as healthy or destructive, trapping men and boys in a cycle of continually proving their harmlessness to the women around them.
Now splashy headlines and bestseller books are sounding the alarm: young men are suffering. While there are some who foolishly insist that any attention paid to the plight of men ignores the systemic inequality women face, there is a growing consensus across disciplines and the political spectrum that is granting long overdue social permission for immediate care for men and boys.
GAVIN NEWSOM TELLS DEMOCRATS TO ‘RUN AWAY’ FROM THE MASCULINITY CRISIS AFFECTING MEN AND BOYS
The urgency is not an exaggeration. This is evident from a recent opinion poll on the occasion of the inauguration Symposium on Young American MenCygnal found that 57% of men aged 16 to 28 rate their mental health as ‘fair’, ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’. Nearly half of the 1,000 respondents in the national survey said they have two or fewer friends, while 11% have no friends at all.
Their loneliness is partly due to the widespread exchange of meaningful relationships for superficial digital engagement. Cygnal found that 50% spent at least five hours a day engaging in online recreational activities, and 45% spent at least three hours a day exclusively on YouTube. Meanwhile, 48% of Gen Z men spend five or fewer hours per week interacting in person with others or engaging in social activities, and 4 in 10 do not have a male mentor.
These data reveal a generation increasingly disconnected from the fabric that has historically sustained young men through life’s trials: genuine human connection, multigenerational learning, and community connection. This epidemic of isolation is not just a social inconvenience. It is nothing less than a civilizational crisis whose most intimate burdens are felt in families, romantic relationships, workplaces and communities.
Yet in this bleak landscape, there exists a proven model that consistently produces the exact opposite: the results our leaders should want for all young people. Fraternity men report dramatically different experiences than their unaffiliated peers, demonstrating that the right kind of structured community, when applied broadly, can reverse these troubling trends.
Those who belong to a fraternity on a college or university campus experience something that is noticeably absent in the broader youth population: a balanced life based on relationships with others. College colleagues and alumni are more likely to limit their recreational online hours (36% spend more than six hours online daily, compared to 53% of unaffiliated men) and spend more time on personal activities (60% spend at least six hours each week socializing with others, compared to 49% of unaffiliated men).
They are also significantly more likely to say their lives are turning out the way they imagined (64% fraternity, 57% unaffiliated men). They are very likely to have a male mentor (71% fraternity, 42% unaffiliated) and maintain close friendships (64% of fraternity men have three or more close friends, compared to 36% of unaffiliated men). And their mental health is a lot better than that of their peers, with their mental health being viewed more positively (53% positive, 14% negative) compared to young men in general (41% positive, 24% negative).
These aren’t just marginal improvements over the general Gen Z population. The data shows a fundamental difference in the way young men experience their formative years and how joining a same-sex group catalyzes markedly better social and emotional well-being for them.
Fraternities have not reinvented the wheel. They simply create the frameworks that people have always relied on for personal fulfillment and growth. They promote structure, responsibility, shared values, self-governance, mentorship and lifelong belonging. At a time when digital isolation has become the default mode of existence, fraternities insist on embodied presence, enduring rituals, and communal responsibility.
The lesson here extends beyond fraternity life. All these results show how obvious the answer is to the struggle of young men: community. We can see clearly what becomes possible when we protect and expand institutions designed to meet young men where they are and guide them with purpose and responsibility.
As policymakers address the crisis facing young American men, they must start with solutions rooted in those real relationships. Hope can be found in rebuilding the kinds of communities, mentorships, and fraternities that have always helped young men navigate the transition to adulthood and beyond.
The brotherhood model proves that when we create spaces where young men can be themselves, both vulnerable and challenged within a context of true brotherhood, they thrive. It’s time we take that lesson seriously and extend it beyond the campus gates to reach all young men searching for their place in an increasingly lonely and fragmented world—for themselves and for all of us.
