Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, like many of the official Washington, recently focused on what it describes as a filthy and far-reaching scandal and cover-up reaches the highest level. She has described how a cabal of some of the world’s most powerful involvement in a shocking criminal conspiracy and then cheated their fellow -Americans in an attempt to cover their spurs.
No, she is not talking about Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose connections with worldwide elites have seized a large part of the country six years after his death. Instead, Gabbard’s assumed bomb, of all things, the 2016 elections.
Her is an attempt to rewrite history, to overthrow established facts with conspiracy fiction, while also throwing away the focus of the current scandal that floods her administration and in particular her boss and political benefactor, President Trump. It is a history that I know as a CIA officer who at the time played a senior role in the National Security Council of President Obama.
Gabbard leaves Obama manager ‘Criminal implications’ to Doj, FBI in Russia Hoax ‘SaaSed Narrative’
First, some background. Gabbard went to social media at the end of last week to appoint the declassification of more than 100 pages with selected material from the second half of 2016. She described their imports into grandiose terms: “Americans will finally learn the truth about how to politized in 2016 in 2016 and armed by the most powerful people in the Obama administration to lay the ground for the ground for what the ground was for the ground for the ground for the ground for the ground of the ground. [Trump]undermine the will of the American people and undermine our Democratic Republic. ”
Gabbard argued that senior Obama officials buried and eventually buried the finding of the intelligence community and ultimately not “hacking” the elections. She then contrasted that assessment with the conclusion of the extensive report that President Obama asked in December 2016. That document, released in a non-classified form the following month, found that Russia followed an “influence campaign” to hinder the candidacy of the former State Secretary Hillary Clinton and to help that of the then candidate Trump. As Gabbard describes it, these alleged analytical discrepancies are a reflection of a “treacherous conspiracy” by Obama officials to “undermine the will of the American people”.
Apart from the fact that President Obama immediately congratulated President Trump on his victory and welcomed him within 72 hours after the election day, there is only one problem with the radical claims of Gabbard: they are not at all true. They are not substantiated in the documents she has released. Instead, Gabbard relies on a rhetorical skill to make her case, repeatedly – and presumably intentionally – the terms that combine “hack” and “influence”.
Legacy Media Winkers are largely silent about Tulsi Gabbard’s Bombshell Obama administration claims
She is right that before and after the election day the intelligence community assessed that Russia did not “hack” the elections – that means that Moscow did not manipulate or manipulated state voters to change the outcome. The Obama administration almost two months before the election one joint explanation Due to the Department of Homeland Security and the office of the director of National Intelligence who calls it “extremely difficult” to change votes because of the decentralized nature of American elections and built -in guarantees. Even Gabbard’s own memo makes it clear that when they ‘hack’ the failure of Russia to ‘hack’ the elections, calling that she refers to Moscow did not change votes, the voter roles changed or the voice process would otherwise disrupt the cyber or physical means.
Obama denies Trump’s ‘bizarre allegations’ that he was Rusiagaat ‘Ringleader’ in rare statement
However, Gabbard’s deception comes into the picture when it contrasts this judgment with the assessment of Moscow’s well documented influence campaign. By using bots for social media, paid advertisements and propaganda sales points, Moscow tried, according to the intelligence community, to denigrate the Clinton campaign and to strengthen that of Trump. Gabbard calls this finding “false” and further claims that earlier analyzes “clearly stated that Russia had not influenced the elections by cyber hacks about the elections.” The intentional distortion is clear: attempts to “influence” voters through information operations and an attempt to change their voices through disturbing or destructive “hacking” are two very different things.
Click here for more the opinion of Fox News
Further undermining the Gabbard case is the fact that others with access to the same set came to the same conclusion as the January 2017 assessment. For example, the Senate Intelligence Committee formally formal Closed During Trump’s first term that Russian agents undertook a broader effort to “influence the 2016 presidential elections by harming Hillary Clinton’s chances of success and supporting Donald Trump in the direction of the Kremlin.” Among the senators behind this report was the current State Secretary Marco Rubio.
Just before the 2020 elections, the Trump administration itself also released a statement, apparently since the purification of the DNI’s website, remark That Russia tried to undermine the then campaign of Biden against President Trump, while adding that some “Kremlin-linked actors” tried to stimulate Trump. At the beginning of 2021, the intelligence community brought one formal assessment In conclusion that President Putin influences the activities on President Biden’s candidacy and the support of President Trump.
The ultimate irony is that Gabbard, whose White House said months ago it worked with the Ministry of Justice to release extra Epstein files, manufactures a scandal to divert attention from the real one that revolves around its administration. It would be a cheap trick if it was performed by just about any other American officer. However, Gabbard is not an ordinary officer; She is responsible for protecting our national security and the most sensitive information.
Click here to get the Fox News app
While our opponents, or rogue states, terrorist groups or cyber criminals try to harm us, the most high intelligence officer of America is busy manufacturing part -time attacks against those who consider the president of his domestic political enemies.
And there is another scandal.
