Economists Stephen Moore and EJ Antoni analyze Democratic tax policies, including New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s appeal to millionaires, and provide an overview of rising gas prices in “The Bottom Line.”
For millions of Americans, higher electric bills are becoming a monthly frustration and a growing factor in the economy interim elections.
Unlike more volatile costs like gasoline, electricity is a constant, unavoidable expense directly tied to basic needs: keeping the lights on, heating and cooling homes, and powering daily life. That makes it particularly politically sensitive at a time when many households still feel pressured by broader inflation and high housing costs.
AMERICANS ARE BEING HIT WITH RISING ELECTRICITY BILLS AS PRICES EXCEED NATIONAL INFLATION
Both Republican and Democratic candidates are expected to discuss rising electricity costs on the campaign trail this midseason. (Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)
The issue gives both parties new campaign ammunition, with Republicans casting higher bills as evidence of failed energy policies, overreaching regulations and a shift away from fossil fuels, while Democrats point to bill relief programs, grid investments and clean energy incentives aimed at easing pressure on household budgets over time.
The battle is unfolding amid sharp regional differences in electricity prices. Federal energy data shows that home energy costs vary widely across the country, illustrating how affordability pressures vary not only by income, but also by geography, infrastructure and energy mix.
The latest figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration put the national average at 17.24 cents per kilowatt hour, up 6% from a year earlier — a jump that outpaces wage growth for many households and adds to the cumulative cost pressures of rent, insurance and groceries.
North Dakota has the lowest average residential electricity rate in the country, at 11.02 cents per kilowatt hour, while Hawaii – an outlier partly shaped by geographic isolation and dependence on imported fuel – has the highest, at 41.62 cents per kWh.
Nebraska, Idaho, Oklahoma and Arkansas are also among the cheapest states, while California, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and New York are among the most expensive along with Hawaii. Many of the more expensive states are also pursuing aggressive clean energy transitions or maintaining older, more complex grid systems – factors that could increase costs in the short term even as they strive to stabilize prices in the long term.
Several of the cheapest states are deep red, a pattern that Republicans are likely to use to bolster broader arguments about energy policy and the cost of living — even though energy prices are determined as much by geography, fuel availability, regulatory structures and long-term infrastructure investments as by party political control.
THE STATES WHERE AMERICANS PAY THE MOST – AND THE LEAST – FOR ELECTRICITY
However, cheap electricity does not always mean affordable energy. Weather extremes, household consumption patterns, home efficiency, aging infrastructure and state-level decisions about utilities all influence what families ultimately pay. For example, in warmer or colder regions, even low rates can translate into high monthly bills due to heavy use of air conditioning or heating.
Utilities are also seeking rate increases in many states to cover electric grid modernization, wildfire mitigation, storm hardening and the expansion of renewable energy sources. energy — costs that are often passed on to consumers gradually but steadily.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
As candidates fan out across the country ahead of the midterm elections, utility bills are becoming a tangible symbol of household stress. (Raquel Natalicchio/Houston Chronicle/Getty Images)
Still, the partisan pattern could prove politically useful in a campaign season marked by household spending concerns and economic uncertainty.
Gas prices may make more headlines, but electricity bills may be more politically sustainable: they come in every month, are harder to reduce quickly, and are often tied to local utilities and regulators. That gives candidates a direct way to connect national energy debates to tangible, recurring household costs and to voter frustration that is felt not at the pump, but at the kitchen table.
